A couple of days ago, I stumbled upon a Facebook group prodding Sean Hannity to keep his promise to undergo waterboarding for charity. They describe themselves as follows:
Sean Hannity recently volunteered on his show to be waterboarded to raise money for the U S Troops and their families. I think this is a laudable cause and I, for one, appreciate his patriotism. Let’s all support Sean in this noble endeavor. I suggest that he make the funds he raises available to Fisher House, a highly rated charity that makes lodging available to 10,000 troop’s families every year. Go to Sean’s contact page and let him know how much you appreciate his volunteerism. And Please: Spread the Word! If Blogoshere [sic] can help Sarah Palin onto the Republican ticket, we can use it for the benefit of the troops as well.
via Facebook | Waterboard Sean Hannity for Charity.
This is why I have stayed away from the torture debate. In brief, I believe we did things that are terribly wrong, in particular by Catholic rules of ethics that I try to live by. But I also think some valid distinctions can and should be made, and have found that discussion of this subject is nearly impossible without being demonized by one side or the other.
This Facebook group is just one symbol of how low this debate has sunk. Among my friends on the left, most believe that we have tortured, that waterboardng is torture, and that George Bush and others in his administration are war criminals. This Facebook group, while somewhat light-hearted, is also clearly of the left, and I suspect its founders and many members also believe waterboarding to be torture.
Yet they urge that Sean Hannity undergo this ordeal. Hannity invited it. He is a blowhard and a self-promoting idiot. He seems to have made this pledge in an off-guard moment and is trying to slink away. I would not be surprised either way, if he decided to quietly back away or to stand up to his pledge. Of course, the more public attention is focused on his pledge and his failure to live up to it, the more pressure he will face to undergo waterboarding.
So this is where we are: the anti-waterboarding faction, the anti-torture partisans, are trying to convince a man to voluntarily experience what they denounce. If he backs off, they win. But if he caves to their pressure, what have they accomplished, and at what cost to themselves, to their souls? I am anti-torture, and of the right. I would welcome a chance to stand with those on the left for a common cause, but I cannot stand with such a group.